Category Archives: Global Warming

Global Warming Discussion

This post, from a speech by Nigel Lawson, is extensive and is one that I am in complete agreement with. Lawson discusses a great many aspects of the issue, from science to politics, and gets it all correct.

Nigel Lawson: Cool It.

It is rare that someone produces a great deal of material on a topic that I don’t have some quibble with, so I thought I’d pass this one along as the best representation of my own thoughts on the topic.

===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle

Chevron

Chevron Fraud

This is an interesting case that has been litigated for a long time. It is essentially Chevron against a coalition of environmentalists and their attorneys, who initially won an $18 billion judgment against the energy company.

But that has changed. Now, in the face of massive fraud by the self-important environmentalists, a New York court has reversed the judgment and castigated the fraudsters in a nearly 500-page opinion. Apparently, the fraudster enviros were so enamored with themselves, they made a movie — and outtakes from the movie, demonstrating the kickbacks and bribes and falsification of evidence, were forced to be released. Kevin Williamson of NRO writes:

What’s notable here is that Chevron’s complaint is under the RICO law, meaning that it implies the existence of an ongoing criminal organization. What we have here, if the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York is correct, is the new face of organized crime, and one of the most spectacular attempts at extortion in recorded history.

Corruption galore, including paid hit-pieces written about the case in Huffington Post and Politico in exchange for a cut of the court winnings. Lots of details here.

The New York Times doesn’t like it, of course. But even they had to close with:

In his ruling, Judge Kaplan said Mr. Donziger “began his involvement in this controversy with a desire to improve conditions in the area in which his Ecuadorean clients live.” But in the end, he and his associates “submitted fraudulent evidence” and otherwise subverted justice. “If ever there were a case warranting equitable relief with respect to a judgment procured by fraud, this is it.”

===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle

MawsonNewYear

Happy New Year!

In Antarctica, there is a place along the frigid coast called Mawson Station. It is named for Sir Douglas Mawson, an Engligh-born Australian explorer who was one of the early Heroic Explorers of Antarctica. His story is quite interesting, especially his survival during one grim trip where things went south, so to speak. There is a bit of info on that in the Wikipedia article, and the story is the subject of the book Alone on the Ice: The Greatest Story in the History of Exploration. Continue reading

The Climate of Dinosaur Science

I have not yet grown out of my “dinosaur phase,” though I must confess that this transition point seems overdue. I’m happy with the current status, at least. But my interest in dinosaur science, like my interest in climate science, goes back several decades. During those decades, I’ve largely made a living in the software/technology field in connection with Microsoft products. And I’ve written about problems in dinosaur research and assertions.

In this story, all of those arenas collide: A software guy from Microsoft digs into dinosaur research, and discovers that paleontology scientists can act exactly like climate scientists. Or like dinosaurs, perhaps.

All the symptoms are there:

  • The graphs and charts and equations are visibly wrong
  • The scientist no longer has the data
  • When challenged, he was not cooperative
  • He worked to stop the challenge to his work from being published, despite admitting that it was correct
  • He cited social reasons as part of his rationale: The challenge “stands to drive a wedge between labs that are currently cordial with one another.”

Sounds like catastrophist climate, in spades. Each of these elements is common when catastrophist scientists are challenged on their work, even when they privately admit to each other the merits of the challenges.

To their credit, some of the co-authors of the dinosaur growth paper were more helpful. It would be more difficult for them were government agencies and multi-million-dollar revenue streams relying upon the details remaining unexamined.

===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle

US_corn_2013

Yielding to Dishonesty

The New Yorker has a new issue out in which they talk about the terrible drought of 2012 and its effect upon corn crops — in the context, oddly, of 2013 being the best year in history for US corn crops.  After opening with how great the harvest is right now, they talk about disaster last year:

In 2012, drought struck nearly eighty per cent of the nation’s farmland, and the growing season was the hottest and driest in decades.

That 80% number sounds bad. How bad was it? They use this anecdotal bit made to sound like a factoid:

“Last year was the worst corn harvest in a century.”

All because of climate change and “extreme weather” of course.  There are several things about this claim that struck me, right off: Continue reading

Arctic Joule Ending Charts

Here’s the spreadsheet and charts as of their arrival today in Cambridge Bay.
Arctic Joule tracking chart

Click on the thumbnail for the full PDF.

I’ve traveled further yesterday than the crew did on their entire journey, but I had a rather easy time of it.  In any event, there will probably be some final wrap-up post from me, as the two posts today from the crew aren’t quite the final ones.

They’ve made it to the halfway mark; I understand that the northwest passage is now blocked at both ends by ice. It was a tough year for the attempt, and they were hoping for a repeat of last year’s unusual conditions. No such luck.

This crew does not sound excited about trying it again in 2014 — perhaps that will change. I will be ready.

===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle

99 K from the Bay

The crew of the Arctic Joule are now blogging openly about their planned end when they reach Cambridge Bay:

After 2 days of stormy winds, we got going again today and I think we were all definitely beginning this morning with the end in mind. This has been an incredible experience so far but I know I am ready to get this done now and get to Cambridge Bay. We were chatting about this earlier today and we’re all on the same page.

So far, they’ve not mentioned anything about trying again next year. They’ve made almost 60 kilometers so far today, and I expect that they’ll be in Cambridge Bay sometime late tomorrow night (Tuesday) if the weather holds. But that weather has been notoriously treacherous (from their perspective, at least).

The updated chart and spreadsheet (PDF) is here, with the front page snapshot here.

===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle